M 4

Case Studies


This case study involves attempts to set up a bilateral scientific research arrangement involving Chinese scientists and Australian government representatives based in the nation’s capital, Canberra. The discussions are ongoing.

Three face-to-face meetings between Chinese and Australians have already been held, the first in the United States in 1999 and the subsequent two in Europe in 2001 and 2003. The setting, each time an international scientific conference held every two years, has been used by the parties as an opportunity to meet and discuss the bilateral agreement.


With the initial contact in 1999 involving no more than discussion concerning areas of mutual interest, the Australians felt no need to take into account cross-cultural considerations. They found the Chinese quite Westernized in their approach to discussions, and nonscientific discussion focused on the then-forthcoming Olympic Games in Sydney.

The Australians regarded the rapport that developed between the two parties as being between scientific colleagues, rather than government representatives. At the conclusion of the conference, it appeared to the Australians that both parties would investigate the formalizing of an agreement on the exchange of scientific information and then share the discoveries of further research.

When they met again in 2001, the parties still seemed enthusiastic about cooperating and indicated that they had in-principle support from their superiors. Following that year’s meeting, the Australians wrote several times to the Chinese in a bid to move things forward, but received only formal replies.

Two things should be noted here: first, that the Australians were trying to initiate business between their department (on behalf of the Australian government) and the Chinese government; and, second, that they attended the conferences for the purpose of work-related self development and not at the behest of the government.

Unresolved Issues

Essentially, all logistical and practical issues of the proposed effort remained unresolved at the start of the third meeting. Both sides had exchanged views and agreed, in principle, to cooperate by mutually making resources available in an effort to bring their hopes for joint research to fruition. However, no formal agreement had been reached.

Notwithstanding, the Australians remained eager to obtain a formal agreement. The Australian team organized the 2003 meeting. While both parties had signaled their intention to attend the 2003 conference, it was only some six weeks before the event that they agreed to have a formal meeting during the conference.

Max Wran, who took the initiative at the third meeting, is not a scientist and so has only limited ability to contribute and is essentially regarded as a support figure. But, with a background in industrial advocacy, he had developed a reputation as a no-nonsense person. Accompanying him was Kevin Porter, a scientist and the one who integrates any learning from the conferences into the department’s operational framework.

Australian Blunder

The meeting took place over two afternoons. No agenda was prepared nor was an interpreter used, since the Australians believed the Chinese representatives had a sufficient grasp of English. The meeting, which the Australians expected to run for about two hours, was loosely chaired by Wran and conducted as a fireside chat.

Following the exchange of pleasantries and discussion on the progress of the conference, Wran steered the conversation in the direction of research cooperation. The Chinese, who agreed that the suggestions put forward were valuable, made many positive statements of support before digressing to discuss sightseeing. Wran, becoming noticeably agitated and increasingly directive in his comments, used the odd profanity to emphasize his point.

Porter noticed that the Chinese were taken back by the crude display, although they made no comment, and the first afternoon eventually ended amicably enough after two-and-a-half hours. The next morning, Porter apologized to the Chinese for Wran’s outbursts and confirmed that a second afternoon meeting would be held. The Chinese appeared very understanding, but Porter sensed their enthusiasm had waned significantly.

During the second afternoon’s meeting, scheduled to last two hours, discussion of the morning’s conference proceedings was interrupted after forty minutes by the Chinese, who left for another appointment. Nothing had been agreed to or signed. The Chinese apologized, saying that the dialogue should be resumed as soon as possible. In a seemingly conciliatory manner, Wran agreed and said he would be in contact and get the ball rolling.

Interpreting Events

The Australians, believing that an arrangement with the Chinese would be formalized in 2003, had expected a real negotiation during which they would convince the Chinese to commit to joint research. Wran’s principal motivation (he later confided to Porter) was the number of trips to China he believed the project would give him.

The Australians adopted a laissez-faire approach to the apparently important meetings, on the assumption that, as both parties were attending an international conference, formality could be disregarded for the side meetings. With no formal or informal agenda prepared or discussed, meetings were held in the context of “let’s talk when we get the chance.”

Wran’s belief that he could steer the meeting toward a positive outcome, using an informal approach and bullying tactics, was not borne out.

The apparent avoidance of specifics by the Chinese at each meeting and their failure to reply to follow-up letters indicate that they were no longer interested in cooperating with the Australians. Although discussions had been friendly on the surface, Wran’s displays of temper and tactical maneuvering had been too unfriendly and unprofessional for the Chinese.

Interviews with the Australians outside the meetings indicated lack of focus on specific issues. There were no statements about the benefits that might accrue to the Chinese. The assumption was that the Chinese were only interested in the quality of scientific information, not its commercial aspects. Failure to include such elements in early discussions perhaps had left the Chinese cold on the idea of combined research.

As of this writing, nothing has been agreed to; there is only recognition that working together would be mutually beneficial. The Australians have yet to engage formally official government channels and have no idea of the extent, if any, of government support for their Chinese colleagues.

The Australians’ approach to their discussions with the Chinese was not sensitive to the latter’s views regarding age and social hierarchy. In 2003, Wran was sixty-one years old and second-in-charge of his organization, while Porter was forty-three. The Chinese scientists were in their early forties (but the Australians did not know their ranks). Given the age and senior position of the Australian lead negotiator, the Chinese may well have been concerned that he was not of sufficient status to engage in serious discussions.

Suggested Fix

To end this impasse, the Australians might initiate formal representations to the Chinese Embassy in Canberra. Such an approach would help speed up negotiations, and the Chinese scientists might then agree to visit Australia, where local hospitality could enhance the chances of a positive outcome.

The Australians might also consider including neutral parties in negotiations. Outside support and recognition may help improve the credibility of the Australians in the eyes of the Chinese. As both sides are linked to an international scientific community that meets every two years, such a strategy easily could be managed.


Without access to the Chinese version of events, it is difficult to draw definitive conclusions from this case. However, it is clear that the Australians were ill prepared to negotiate with their Chinese counterparts. They assumed no research or preparation was needed, simply because meetings took place on neutral territory. Adding to the difficulties was the assumption on the part of Wran that his personal and conflict-resolution styles would overcome all obstacles.

Additionally, by failing to demonstrate cross-cultural awareness, the Australians offended the Chinese, who simply walked away from the discussion. Wran’s cowboy strategy was unsuitable for forging new relationships and negotiating a venture with the Chinese. Porter believes that the goodwill built up previously is in jeopardy and even may have been lost.

Porter has been in contact by e-mail with one of the Chinese scientists, on a personal level. However, there has been no formal correspondence with the Chinese since 2003. While the Australians believe themselves still to be serious about engaging the Chinese in this venture, with no understanding of how the Chinese are thinking it seems unlikely that they have any idea regarding how to proceed.

So, is it overstating the case to call the 2001 initial encounter a negotiation? The Australians believe not. They view those discussions as a successful prelude that had gone a long way toward establishing common ground between the parties.

Be that as it may, momentum has been lost for a number of reasons. Wran and Porter did not work together as a team. Wran, overconfident about his abilities as a professional negotiator, was not able to accept feedback on his style or undertake a postmortem on why things turned out the way they had.

It is intriguing to speculate what lesson Qing of Chando might have foisted on the Australians.

The Real Negotiation Problem Issue

One of the biggest stumbling blocks encountered negotiators is to clearly understand the real issues as the root cause and basis for ...
Negotiating with WalMart Buyers

WalMart, the world's largest retailer, sold $482.1 billion worth of goods in 2016. With its single-minded focus on "EDLP" (everyday l...
How Microsoft Outnegotiated Netscape in the Browser War

Back in 1996, Steve Case’s AOL was urgently seeking a top notch internet browser to market their products. Both Bill Gates’ Micro...
Trust Building in a Trilateral China Japan Western Negotiation

by - Dr Bob March

Overview This complex, ongoing negotiation involves three countries, each with players who have their own agenda and preferred outco...
Nepal-india Water Negotiations (Power Asymmetry)
Nepal-India Water Negotiations (Power Asymmetry)

India is 40 times larger in land area than Nepal and India was hungry to meet its increasing electrical power needs. Nepal is one of ...
Business Expansion Woven From Trust
Business Expansion Woven From Trust

by - Dr Bob March

Another example of someone who fitted in completely with the Chinese is the China trader Paul Winestock, who had been dealing with th...
Camp David Third Party Intervener

There are occasions when negotiating parties cannot see the forest for the trees. They are unable to see past their own goals and int...
The Cost of Death on Chinese Roads

by - Dr Bob March

Overview Mark Rogers is an English expatriate in Beijing, where he is the finance director of the branch of a U.S. multinational. He...
The Panama Canal Negotiations

The successful construction of the Panama Canal was one of the world's great engineering feats. The negotiations to complete and buil...
Contract Renegotiation with the Chilean Government

In the 1960’s Kennecott (Rio Tinto), a U.S. company, was about to enter into renegotiation over its contract with the government of...
Enron case
Enron’s Indian Negotiation Debacle

In the early 1990s, the US energy giant Enron, decided it needed to diversify by expanding its growth abroad with emerging countries....
China Australia case
Scientists and Bureaucrats - Orientation Issues

by - Dr Bob March

Overview This case study involves attempts to set up a bilateral scientific research arrangement involving Chinese scientists and Au...
Gaming in Shanghai

by - Dr Bob March

Overview HyperHawk, one of the world’s major providers of global supply management software and services, helps companies reduce c...
Andorra versus the European Community (EC)

As a vestige of Charlemagne’s Empire, Andorra is a small land locked principality snuggled between France and Spain. Andorra is joi...
Businessman select mask. Vector flat illustration
How Giving Face Can Brew Negotiation Success

by - Dr Bob March

Overview Rod Zemanek, the principal negotiator, designer and Project Manager of an Australian chemical engineering consultancy, (Pre...
Creative Problem Solving In Negotiations
Creative Problem Solving in Negotiations

All too often, negotiators can become tied up and bound as they commit to taking a competitive approach to their negotiation. As a re...
Power in a Canadian Trade Negotiation

There are many occasions when a smaller company will want to form a negotiation partnership with a larger organization to further the...
Kuwait Invasion Negotiation Perspective

On a scorching summer day in August 1990, the citizens of Kuwait stared in puzzlement then fear at the encroaching dusty streams o...
Lehman Leadership Negotiation Rivalry

Many people like to believe that the people in charge of the organizations that employ them are always working as a skillful negotiat...
Chinese Water Selling Negotiation

by - Dr Bob March

Overview Acqua International (AQ) is a Europe-based multinational company that has interests in water and other environment-related ...
Using Mediation for Resolving Disputes

Companies that find themselves embroiled in a bitter feud over a contract dispute have three options to find a solution. They can lit...
How NOT to Negotiate in China

by - Dr Bob March

Overview In 1998 Simon Turner worked for Bassano, a large Australian women's wear company with eighteen retail outlets across Austra...
Unequal Indonesian Foreign Negotiations

When two parties enter into an unequal negotiation, in terms of the negotiation power they bring to the table, the interests or goals...
Win-win Negotiation Badly Executed
Win-Win Negotiation Badly Executed

In trying to create win-win negotiation agreements, one of the biggest mistakes made by negotiators is to deal with the issues on an ...
The Fixed Pie Syndrome in Union Negotiation

The mythical fixed pie syndrome is one of those bizarre anomalies that still persistently seep stealthily into the minds of the large...
Illustration of a long shadow China flag with the text HOT PRICE
Chinese Negotiation Training on Sales Price

by - Dr Bob March

Sales Negotiation Overview K. G. Marwin Inc. developed a particular technology in the 1980s, called the Trilliamp Process, that the ...
Third Party Agents - Forgery word cloud concept with fraud false related tags
Third Party Agents

Third party agents are often used to represent our interests in the negotiation process. We use them as we believe that their experti...
The Price of Giving Face in China

by - Dr Bob March

Overview Chando, a Chinese shipbuilder, had agreed to change the main engine in a ship it was building for the Danish shipowner Dans...
Competitive Conflict Escalation
Competitive Business Conflict Escalation

Competition is clearly a healthy means to increase sales for any business. It is essential because it provides a stimulus for a compa...
Negotiation Alliances
Negotiation Alliances

In multiparty negotiations, the negotiation power, or the position of one negotiating party, can be enhanced or weakened by making al...
Negotiation Overconfidence

Successful business managers need to possess a high level of confidence to succeed and meet the many challenges they face in a fast p...
China business relationships case
Chinese Business Negotiations' 'Guanxi'

by - Dr Bob March

A well-known, government-owned, five-star hotel in Beijing owns an associated marketing company called High Jewel Marketing. With bra...
Distributive Negotiation Settlement

A distributive negotiation will focus on the division of a set amount of resources, largely determined by the aspiration price (the m...
VW's Long-Term Negotiation Thinking pays off in China

by - Dr Bob March

Negotiation Overview At the time this case was written, Volkswagen (VW) was the first foreign overseas car-maker in China to have be...
Political Impact on Global Negotiations

Negotiators have a general understanding of their own local political environment. They are raised in a business milieu that clearly ...
Foreign Currency Contract Agreement Risks

When a negotiator embarks on an negotiating an international agreement with a foreign partner, they have to give serious consideratio...
Union Constituency Authority Limits

Union negotiators may find that the authority limits they are authorised to observe in a collective bargaining labour negotiation on ...
The Importance of Business Communications (Japan Negotiation)

The importance of keeping the lines of communication open with your business partners cannot be overemphasized. Both our domestic par...
Success in China - The Celanese Joint Venture

by - Dr Bob March

Disclaimer: It is against the The Negotiation Experts' principles to offer its services to the tobacco industry. This Celanese case s...