M 4
Select Page
We're here for you. Train online, facilitator led, using the world's most advanced simulation game.

It's time to replace stress with confidence.

“It was fun but before I knew it, I was negotiating better.”  

Updated: 23 May 2019

Trust in Negotiation



Roger Fisher has written that "the less an agreement depends on trust, the more likely it is to be implemented". Is this a part of his "universal" principles? I wouldnt think so. In fact, I dont think he has thought this through.What do you think?

Bob from United Kingdom


Nowadays it is difficult to make a deal if there is no trust between counterparts. Even if one manages to make such a deal it will be very challenging to implement it. Building trust is absolutely essential in any meaningful long-term relationship, regardless of whether you're selling, buying, resolving conflict. Most deals, even one-time deals, have consequences in the future. Roger Fisher wrote about the importance of trust, and principled negotiation is largely based on trust. So I would think that your quoted sentence should be viewed in the context in which it was written.

Yes, I would expect that Roger Fisher, in books like Getting to Yes, was contrasting an agreement based purely on trust without a contract, versus an agreement that was written up in contract. Our preference is to have an agreement based on trust that is written up in contract. So the best of both.

Worth noting is that Roger Fisher is not noted as having expertise in cross cultural international business negotiations. A contract is important in countries that possess a strong and efficient judicial system. So a written contract in China or India for example would be far more difficult to enforce than a contract in the USA for example. So relationship becomes comparatively more important to a deal being implemented in China and India.

It's worth discussing how trust is fostered. An important element is the authority of your word and the credibility of your actions. Its better to say what you know than not know what you're saying. Agreements are difficult in the absence of mutual respect and reliability. Both private and business life is full of examples where the future depends on the quality of relationships. For instance, marriage is a relationship, with lack of trust, respect and faith in our partner, marriage becomes nothing else but an empty agreement. A trusting business relationship is similar.

There are interesting situations like hostage negotiations, where the negotiator will use sincerity and reliability as the building blocks of trust. As a hostage negotiator, you can not let yourself play a dominant and even aggressive role, controlling the situation. Or you can become an ally and empathise with the hostage takers. The dynamics of each relationship are very different. Hostage negotiators need to be versed in both approaches.

Unexpected situations confront business people on a regular basis. Situations that would have been difficult to foresee at the time of drawing up an initial agreement. A solid foundation of trust may be the only link to resolve the issue. Given the choice of negotiating with an untrustworthy party, people with other alternatives will generally exercise these alternatives.

Building trust requires time and even some risk, especially when we start a new partnership or business relationship. If you don't fully trust each other, find ways to minimize your vulnerability and thus reduce the risk of your negotiation failing. There are several ways to secure agreements in the absence of trust. These include setting up monitoring regimes, creating guarantees and proceeding incrementally. There is a need for trust to facilitate sharing information with the other side. The most value-creating agreements are those in which both sides openly share data. The result of studies by the consulting firm 'A.T. Kearney' showed that trust in high-level business alliances is of particular significance. A direct correlation exists between trust and profit. This means that if you consistently share data with clients, not only will trust go up, but so too will the quality of your agreements and with these, so too will your profits. It may take several meetings to develop this trust, but it will definitely pay off. Developing trust has become a key source of sustainable competitive advantage. Once trust is built, keep in mind that it is much easier to spoil it than create it.

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 StarsRate this Article
5 out of 5 from 1 responses
1 comment
  • 0
    Charles Crawford on

    As a former diplomat I tend to agree with Fisher on this one.

    WHY is ‘trust’ so important? You can strike a deal without trusting the other side but include in it verification and other devices to get round the absence of trust. That’s how international arms control deals typically work.

    You might even argue that BECAUSE you don’t trust the other side (and they don’t trust you either) it may be easier to deal with them in some cases.

    The cultural issues are interesting. Some cultures do seem to expect a long period of relationship-building before much happens. Not clear how far that signifies building ‘trust’ as such.

  • Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *